Friday, July 31, 2009

Somebody else is on the visual harmony train...

David O' Reilly (whose stuff I just wrote about earlier this week) has an article on the Illustrative-berlin blog. In his article he expounds on his thoughts on the vital necessity of creating an animated world that is cohesive- that obeys its own rules where every element fits together into what he calls "aesthetic harmony". An excerpt...
My central belief is that the key to aesthetics is coherence. In 3d we essentially create artificial models of worlds, I contend that what makes these worlds believable is simply how coherent they are; how all the elements tie together under a set of rules which govern them consistently. This coherence spreads to all areas of a film; dialogue, design, sound, music, movement etc. Together they create a feedback-loop which reaffirms that what we are looking at is true. The human eye wants this aesthetic harmony.

It felt like I was reading my own thoughts played back to me. Earlier this year I wrote about the necessity of Visual Harmony, and how this visual harmony is the primary (sole?) determinant of the audience's perception of 'quality' in animated works. Here's what I had to say back then...
Basically, visuals and motion and shapes and forms all desire to be in harmony. When they are not then a discernable (if not defineable) dischord occurs. ....

Once you ramp up one area of the visuals into a higher order of complexity (say, lighting or texturing) then all other areas need to rise accordingly to maintain that harmony. ...

Drop the level of complexity in any area and you create a sort of "off-key" feel to the animated film. General audiences understand this. When the visual harmony is well done they immediately perceive the animated film as having 'quality'.... There is such a thing as animation that lacks complexity or realism or literalism but yet still has a high degree of quality, simply because all the pieces 'fit'. So complexity or literalism is not the equivalent of quality- visual harmony is.

It's very rewarding to see somebody else "getting it". Read O'Relly's article. You'll find quite a bit of neat stuff in there.

2 comments:

sunny kharbanda said...

Really interesting essay. Well thought out and well stated. Definitely a bookmark I'd like to come back and re-read from time to time.

I like what he wrote about "Style". If you're true to yourself and your artistic instincts, then you don't need to force a style on to your work; it just naturally comes out that way. Style can't be taught, but I believe we can learn it for ourselves by trying out the things we gravitate towards in other people's work.

Kinda like the tests you've been working on. You explore and explore, and settle on something that resonates with you - something that "feels right". That becomes your style.

Kinda like life, isn't it? Everything flows naturally if we keep an open mind and above all, stay true to ourselves.

LampshadeMan said...

Well, I guess the only question now, is whether this concept will be refered to as visual harmony or aestetic harmony in the textbooks. But seriously, good information as one always gets from reading your blog. Thanks. Can't wait until the next animation test!